I've hugely been inspired by Sir
Ken Robinson ever since I heard his TED talk. I also ended up reading his book.
It wasn't as inspiring as his speech, but that’s another point. But there are
some amazingly insightful points on creativity he touches upon. I’d like to
discuss one of them here.
Often when Sir Robinson asks a group
a question “How would you rate your intelligence from 0-10?” he gets a
patterned response. Very few people rate their intelligence between 9 and 10
and as many rate them between 3 and 4. For saving some people the embarrassment
he doesn't go below the rating 3. But the vast majority of the group almost
always rates its intelligence between 5 and 7. A typical bell curve is formed.
Bell Curve on people rating their intelligence from 0-10 |
Sir Robinson believes that this
method of gauging intelligence is flawed. Intelligence cannot be measured by a
SAT, GMAT or JEE score. That’s simply a mark of how well you can study. It isn't necessary that people with low IQ scores are not intelligent. I know – it
sounds like a paradox, right? After all, IQ does stand for Intelligence
Quotient.
So what is intelligence? A common
way to define it is “the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.”
Most people think intelligence is tangible, measurable. But intelligence is
also linked to different aspects like logic, abstract thinking, understanding,
self-awareness, communication and more. Can intelligence be measured in those
aspects too?
It can’t, can it? Intelligence is
not just about how good you are at mathematics, logical reasoning and language.
It’s also about how good you are at solving problems; even ensuring they don’t
arise. Or how brilliant you are in your field – be it advertising, marketing,
finance… even cooking! Or your ability to gauge situations… see what is not
seen by others. Or your ability to manage people well.
These aspects cannot be quantified.
However, it doesn't mean that people possessing these skills are not
intelligent. Yes, floating news is that Steve Jobs and Bill Gates had IQs of
160, but their intelligence was not defined by how much their SAT scores were. Also,
it’s unlikely that Sir Richard Branson would score well in an IQ test. Will you
say that he, Sharad Pawar, Dhirubhai Ambani and the likes are/were not
intelligent people? Or would you say Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Sachin Tendulkar
are not intelligent because they weren't great at academics?
We believe education makes us
intelligent. Unfortunately, education is often assumed to be the curriculum
taught in school. Ever wondered why maths and science are given more weightage while
arts and music take a back seat? Because the industry needs the former… maths
and science are more likely to get us a job. But creativity and intelligence
are different. They demand you think and act beyond more than what this world
expects of you. And each one of us is intelligent; each of us is creative. We've just stifled that side of us for fear of ridicule from the world. And we try to
curb that intelligence in kids also, thinking that being different won’t get
them anywhere. Apart from not being fair, this robs the world of many
opportunities to improve… in art, culture, technology, education and more.
Remember, the question shouldn't be “How Intelligent Are You?” Instead, ask yourself (and anyone else) “How Are
You Intelligent?” What makes you special, not how special you are.
image Courtesy: Google Images
The main problem is trying to gauge the intelligence itself. It's such a complex thing. Intelligence, according to me, is the ability to acquire knowledge, ability to reason and assess in a logical way and then take actions accordingly. When the knowledge itself can be so varied, how can the intelligence be evaluated.?
ReplyDeleteVery well written. Enjoyed reading. :-)
Thanks, Kanthu. It's encouraging for a writer when a reader gets the idea spot on :)
DeleteVery nice article. And the last line...sums up all that you are trying to say very aptly :)
ReplyDeletewow! Never actually sat down to think WHAT intelligence might actually mean. Well, your post has made me wonder.... I would say intelligence has a lot to do with the speed at which one can assimilate the knowledge all around, and react accordingly.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Thinktank and Nirvana. Glad you liked the article :)
ReplyDeleteVery insightful and logical. The norm is that a scorecard and the school ranks are considered as an evidence to intelligence. Parents and relatives insist that the one who is good at studies will get a good job. Well of course he will. The way he has been studying proves that he follows rules and will follow the management guidelines too. Intelligence or smartness indeed has many sides
ReplyDeleteReally nice point of view.
ReplyDeleteDhirubhai, Dhoni, Branson are actually skilled people. They are successful people. but that does not necessarily mean they should be intelligent.
Being intelligent should not be confused with being skilled or successful. Or being happy !! also, it does not ensure you would be successful or skilled. But it only means you can grasp things or concepts faster than some others can.
Thanks for sharing your views!! cheers :)
Devil and Purvesh, thank you very much for your comments...
ReplyDelete